Advertisement
CMCSA vs LBRDB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCSA is a Hold and LBRDB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMCSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBRDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMCSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LBRDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMCSA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBRDB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMCSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LBRDB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CMCSA (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while LBRDB (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMCSA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.27% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CMCSA | LBRDB | CMCSA / LBRDB | |
| Capitalization | 111B | 8.81B | 1,260% |
| EBITDA | 47.5B | 1.58B | 3,008% |
| Gain YTD | -17.072 | -2.652 | 644% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.97 | 9.18 | 54% |
| Revenue | 124B | 1.05B | 11,787% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 180M | - |
| Total Debt | 102B | 3.14B | 3,249% |
CMCSA | LBRDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMCSA's Valuation (41) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBRDB (85) in the null industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
CMCSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDB (100) in the null industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
CMCSA's SMR Rating (38) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBRDB (95) in the null industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
CMCSA's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBRDB (65) in the null industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDB's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CMCSA (97) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that LBRDB’s stock grew similarly to CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
| CMCSA | LBRDB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 49% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | N/A |
Advertisement
CMCSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCSA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMCSA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMCSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA | 100% | +1.97% | ||
| LBRDK - CMCSA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| CHTR - CMCSA | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| LBRDA - CMCSA | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| ATUS - CMCSA | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.66% | ||
| T - CMCSA | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
LBRDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDB has been closely correlated with LBRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDB jumps, then LBRDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDB | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBRDA - LBRDB | 67% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDB | 66% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| CHTR - LBRDB | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| CABO - LBRDB | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.35% | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDB | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||