CMCLF
Price
$0.91
Change
+$0.01 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
CPFXF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
87.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCLF vs CPFXF

Header iconCMCLF vs CPFXF Comparison
Open Charts CMCLF vs CPFXFBanner chart's image
CMOC GROUP
Price$0.91
Change+$0.01 (+1.11%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization17.95B
Copper Fox Metals
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$505
Capitalization87.02M
CMCLF vs CPFXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCLF vs. CPFXF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCLF is a Hold and CPFXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCLF: $0.91 vs. CPFXF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: CMCLF and CPFXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCLF: 32% vs. CPFXF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CMCLF: $17.95B vs. CPFXF: $87.02M
CMCLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $17.95B. CPFXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $87.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPFXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CPFXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CPFXF.

Price Growth

CMCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.62% price change this week, while CPFXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCLF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than CPFXF($87M). CMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 44.306 vs. CPFXF (6.145). CMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3B vs. CPFXF (-930.79K). CMCLF has more cash in the bank: 38.7B vs. CPFXF (929K). CPFXF has less debt than CMCLF: CPFXF (432K) vs CMCLF (46.7B). CMCLF has higher revenues than CPFXF: CMCLF (173B) vs CPFXF (0).
CMCLFCPFXFCMCLF / CPFXF
Capitalization17.9B87M20,575%
EBITDA10.3B-930.79K-1,106,587%
Gain YTD44.3066.145721%
P/E Ratio22.22N/A-
Revenue173B0-
Total Cash38.7B929K4,165,770%
Total Debt46.7B432K10,810,185%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCLF vs CPFXF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCLF
CPFXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4173
SMR RATING
1..100
6990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCLF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPFXF (93). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPFXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CPFXF (73). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPFXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CPFXF (90). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPFXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CPFXF (48). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPFXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CPFXF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew similarly to CPFXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARQT13.43-0.07
-0.52%
Arcutis Biotherapeutics
CSCO64.09-1.01
-1.55%
Cisco Systems
VNT35.50-0.97
-2.66%
Vontier Corp
NEXN9.94-0.43
-4.15%
Nexxen International Ltd
VRCA0.62-0.05
-7.52%
Verrica Pharmaceuticals

CPFXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPFXF and ALGEF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPFXF and ALGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPFXF
1D Price
Change %
CPFXF100%
-2.06%
ALGEF - CPFXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMOTF - CPFXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
GEODF - CPFXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
CMRZF - CPFXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSRNF - CPFXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More