CMCL
Price
$19.29
Change
-$0.04 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
208.64M
39 days until earnings call
IRVRF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
23.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMCL vs IRVRF

Header iconCMCL vs IRVRF Comparison
Open Charts CMCL vs IRVRFBanner chart's image
Caledonia Mining
Price$19.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
Volume$421.24K
Capitalization208.64M
Irving Resources
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$55.5K
Capitalization23.68M
CMCL vs IRVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCL vs. IRVRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCL is a Buy and IRVRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCL: $19.29 vs. IRVRF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CMCL and IRVRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCL: 258% vs. IRVRF: 121%
Market capitalization -- CMCL: $208.64M vs. IRVRF: $23.68M
CMCL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $208.64M. IRVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $23.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRVRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCL is a better buy in the long-term than IRVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRVRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IRVRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRVRF is a better buy in the short-term than CMCL.

Price Growth

CMCL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while IRVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMCL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCL($209M) has a higher market cap than IRVRF($23.7M). CMCL YTD gains are higher at: 109.107 vs. IRVRF (29.338). CMCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.2M vs. IRVRF (-2.03M). CMCL has more cash in the bank: 10.8M vs. IRVRF (6.58M). IRVRF has less debt than CMCL: IRVRF (180K) vs CMCL (21.3M). CMCL has higher revenues than IRVRF: CMCL (142M) vs IRVRF (0).
CMCLIRVRFCMCL / IRVRF
Capitalization209M23.7M882%
EBITDA20.2M-2.03M-997%
Gain YTD109.10729.338372%
P/E Ratio9.19N/A-
Revenue142M0-
Total Cash10.8M6.58M164%
Total Debt21.3M180K11,833%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCL vs IRVRF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCL
IRVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
6591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCL's Valuation (9) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (26) in the null industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100) in the null industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCL's SMR Rating (65) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (91) in the null industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCL's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (38) in the null industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCL's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100) in the null industry. This means that CMCL’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCLIRVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PUBGY27.690.43
+1.60%
Publicis Groupe S.A.
PHJMF0.05N/A
N/A
PT Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Terbuka
CSGQF1.38N/A
N/A
Costain Group Plc
IRCDF1.37N/A
N/A
Intercede Group PLC
ADHI0.07N/A
N/A
Arsenal Digital Holdings Inc.

CMCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCL has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMCL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCL
1D Price
Change %
CMCL100%
-0.21%
PAAS - CMCL
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.84%
WPM - CMCL
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
MUX - CMCL
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
SA - CMCL
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.83%
CGAU - CMCL
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
More

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and KUYAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and KUYAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
+0.51%
KUYAF - IRVRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
EMPYF - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
FSXLF - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
CMCL - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
SVRSF - IRVRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
More