Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCIX vs NRGSX
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CMCIX vs NRGSX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap I
Price$26.21
Change+$0.31 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.23M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
CMCIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. CMCIX (30.2M). CMCIX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CMCIX (0.39) vs NRGSX (0.06). CMCIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CMCIX (14 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CMCIX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCIX: NRGSX (0) vs CMCIX (1000000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. CMCIX (-7.60). CMCIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.30 vs. NRGSX (7.76).
| CMCIX | NRGSX | CMCIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.74 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.74 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.456 | -2.862 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.2M | 8.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.06 | 611% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.60 | -6.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.20 | 12.34 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.30 | 7.76 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.23 | 17.91 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement