Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$13.15
Change-$0.28 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CMCCX (1.85B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. CMCCX (-11.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. CMCCX (-29.32).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.155 | 14.415 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 41B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.35 | 7.13 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.01 | 61.85 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.32 | 33.85 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.56 | 118.92 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement