Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$16.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. CMCCX (1.88B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 174.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. CMCCX (1.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. CMCCX (-25.57).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.949 | 11.103 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 41.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.16 | 12.97 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.92 | 63.92 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.57 | 49.17 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.08 | 104.19 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers