Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$13.86
Change+$0.12 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.36
Change+$0.72 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CMCCX (1.91B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.46 vs. CMCCX (-5.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.56 vs. CMCCX (-31.11).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.044 | 3.944 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 40.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.39 | 14.46 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.59 | 64.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.11 | 25.56 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.94 | 145.01 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement