Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCCX vs FSMAX
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CMCCX vs FSMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
Price$16.11
Change-$0.61 (-3.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
CMCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. CMCCX (1.82B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CMCCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs CMCCX (0.00). CMCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CMCCX (22 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CMCCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 174.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CMCCX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. CMCCX (-10.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. CMCCX (-27.04).
| CMCCX | FSMAX | CMCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.04 | 5,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.04 | 5,429% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.771 | 11.532 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 41.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.05 | 7.45 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.92 | 55.42 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.04 | 44.70 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.37 | 106.36 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement