CMBT
Price
$8.46
Change
+$0.17 (+2.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
11 days until earnings call
TEN
Price
$20.43
Change
+$0.44 (+2.20%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
615.51M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs TEN

Header iconCMBT vs TEN Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs TENBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$8.46
Change+$0.17 (+2.05%)
Volume$207.18K
Capitalization1.69B
Tsakos Energy Navigation
Price$20.43
Change+$0.44 (+2.20%)
Volume$168.65K
Capitalization615.51M
CMBT vs TEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. TEN commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Hold and TEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $8.46 vs. TEN: $20.43)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. TEN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 210% vs. TEN: 48%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $1.69B vs. TEN: $615.51M
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.69B. TEN’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $615.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $103.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEN is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TEN is a better buy in the short-term than CMBT.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -6.73% price change this week, while TEN (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

TEN is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.28% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($1.69B) has a higher market cap than TEN($616M). CMBT has higher P/E ratio than TEN: CMBT (6.63) vs TEN (4.57). TEN YTD gains are higher at: 21.327 vs. CMBT (-14.804). TEN has more cash in the bank: 350M vs. CMBT (163M). TEN has less debt than CMBT: TEN (1.71B) vs CMBT (5.4B).
CMBTTENCMBT / TEN
Capitalization1.69B616M274%
EBITDA783MN/A-
Gain YTD-14.80421.327-69%
P/E Ratio6.634.57145%
Revenue935MN/A-
Total Cash163M350M47%
Total Debt5.4B1.71B316%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs TEN: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
TEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
3770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
762
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
22n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as TEN (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (100) in the null industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEN (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (85) in the null industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEN (62) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTTEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEPAX14.080.01
+0.07%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income A
GUXPX5.68N/A
N/A
Gabelli Utilities C
DHLTX25.74-0.18
-0.69%
Diamond Hill Select I
TPLNX19.23-0.16
-0.83%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value A
RYMDX132.14-1.15
-0.86%
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy H

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
+2.05%
TNK - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
TEN - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
DHT - CMBT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
INSW - CMBT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
TRMD - CMBT
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
More

TEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEN has been closely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEN jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEN
1D Price
Change %
TEN100%
+2.20%
INSW - TEN
84%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
TNK - TEN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
FRO - TEN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
DHT - TEN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
NAT - TEN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More