CMBT
Price
$9.02
Change
-$0.19 (-2.06%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.23B
58 days until earnings call
MARPS
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs MARPS

Header iconCMBT vs MARPS Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs MARPSBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$9.02
Change-$0.19 (-2.06%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.23B
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.53
Change+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization8.24M
CMBT vs MARPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. MARPS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and MARPS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $9.02 vs. MARPS: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. MARPS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 50% vs. MARPS: 41%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. MARPS: $8.24M
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $8.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MARPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the short-term than CMBT.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.74% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -13.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.58% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($3.23B) has a higher market cap than MARPS($8.24M). MARPS has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: MARPS (9.51) vs CMBT (3.89). MARPS YTD gains are higher at: 19.637 vs. CMBT (-7.251). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. MARPS (849K). CMBT has more cash in the bank: 160M vs. MARPS (994K). CMBT has higher revenues than MARPS: CMBT (1.34B) vs MARPS (1.13M).
CMBTMARPSCMBT / MARPS
Capitalization3.23B8.24M39,211%
EBITDA1.05B849K123,910%
Gain YTD-7.25119.637-37%
P/E Ratio3.899.5141%
Revenue1.34B1.13M118,246%
Total Cash160M994K16,097%
Total Debt1.79BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
3715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1628
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARPS (42). This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CMBT (100). This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CMBT (37). This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CMBT (61). This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (28). This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTMARPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNCCX17.900.17
+0.96%
Hartford International Growth C
PMBCX36.750.27
+0.74%
Principal MidCap C
SHXYX14.700.04
+0.27%
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps Y
IRMCX10.150.02
+0.20%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
PSCJX23.01-0.02
-0.09%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R4

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
-0.43%
NVGS - CMBT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
TRMD - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
TNK - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
INSW - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
DHT - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
+2.61%
BPT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CMBT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
IMPP - MARPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
NGL - MARPS
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
GLNG - MARPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More