CMBT
Price
$9.04
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.23B
58 days until earnings call
INSW
Price
$36.27
Change
-$0.21 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 1, 11:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.6B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs INSW

Header iconCMBT vs INSW Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs INSWBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$9.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.23B
International Seaways
Price$36.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.58%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.6B
CMBT vs INSW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. INSW commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and INSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CMBT: $9.02 vs. INSW: $36.48)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. INSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 50% vs. INSW: 93%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.23B vs. INSW: $2.6B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.23B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INSW is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • INSW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMBT and INSW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.74% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.71% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($3.23B) has a higher market cap than INSW($2.6B). INSW has higher P/E ratio than CMBT: INSW (4.82) vs CMBT (3.89). INSW YTD gains are higher at: 5.370 vs. CMBT (-9.164). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. INSW (755M). INSW has more cash in the bank: 187M vs. CMBT (160M). INSW has less debt than CMBT: INSW (745M) vs CMBT (1.79B). CMBT has higher revenues than INSW: CMBT (1.34B) vs INSW (1.07B).
CMBTINSWCMBT / INSW
Capitalization3.23B2.6B124%
EBITDA1.05B755M139%
Gain YTD-9.1645.370-171%
P/E Ratio3.894.8281%
Revenue1.34B1.07B125%
Total Cash160M187M86%
Total Debt1.79B745M241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
INSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
3741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBT's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (8) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (100) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (41) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (61) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INSW (53) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than INSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTINSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRULX16.290.08
+0.49%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R3
IVORX18.820.06
+0.32%
Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps R
FNICX32.41N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights C
FBPEX26.52N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Div Plus Inst
MSFAX35.68N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise I

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
-2.06%
NVGS - CMBT
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
TNK - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
TRMD - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
INSW - CMBT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
DHT - CMBT
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
More

INSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INSW
1D Price
Change %
INSW100%
-1.46%
TNK - INSW
88%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
DHT - INSW
83%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
STNG - INSW
83%
Closely correlated
-3.19%
FRO - INSW
80%
Closely correlated
-3.36%
TK - INSW
79%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
More