CMBT
Price
$12.77
Change
+$3.69 (+40.64%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.75B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INSW
Price
$61.05
Change
+$16.34 (+36.55%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.98B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMBT vs INSW

Header iconCMBT vs INSW Comparison
Open Charts CMBT vs INSWBanner chart's image
CMB.TECH
Price$12.77
Change+$3.69 (+40.64%)
Volume$25.14K
Capitalization3.75B
International Seaways
Price$61.05
Change+$16.34 (+36.55%)
Volume$700
Capitalization2.98B
CMBT vs INSW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMBT vs. INSW commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBT is a Buy and INSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CMBT: $12.98 vs. INSW: $60.38)
Brand notoriety: CMBT: Notable vs. INSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMBT: 100% vs. INSW: 77%
Market capitalization -- CMBT: $3.75B vs. INSW: $2.98B
CMBT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.75B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $13.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INSW is a better buy in the long-term than CMBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMBT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INSW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMBT and INSW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMBT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +10.94% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.86% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBT($3.75B) has a higher market cap than INSW($2.98B). CMBT has higher P/E ratio than INSW: CMBT (15.64) vs INSW (13.75). CMBT YTD gains are higher at: 35.198 vs. INSW (24.367). CMBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 811M vs. INSW (417M). INSW has less debt than CMBT: INSW (804M) vs CMBT (5.62B). CMBT has higher revenues than INSW: CMBT (1.3B) vs INSW (770M).
CMBTINSWCMBT / INSW
Capitalization3.75B2.98B126%
EBITDA811M417M194%
Gain YTD35.19824.367144%
P/E Ratio15.6413.75114%
Revenue1.3B770M169%
Total Cash38.9MN/A-
Total Debt5.62B804M699%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMBT vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings
CMBT
INSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7029
SMR RATING
1..100
7465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INSW's Valuation (18) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (47) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMBT (70) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's SMR Rating (65) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CMBT (74) in the null industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to CMBT’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (39) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

CMBT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as INSW (4) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CMBT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMBTINSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INSW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSSYX10.840.13
+1.21%
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Z
GEMIX33.180.03
+0.09%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq Instl
FIDSX16.01N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Financials Port
DRIOX11.96N/A
N/A
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth
FNITX42.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights M

CMBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBT has been loosely correlated with TEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBT jumps, then TEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBT
1D Price
Change %
CMBT100%
-0.46%
TEN - CMBT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
INSW - CMBT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
HYTLF - CMBT
53%
Loosely correlated
-16.61%
FRO - CMBT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
TNK - CMBT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
More

INSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INSW
1D Price
Change %
INSW100%
+1.22%
TNK - INSW
89%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
TEN - INSW
87%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
TK - INSW
87%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
DHT - INSW
85%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
STNG - INSW
82%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
More