Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMALX vs RLBCX
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CMALX vs RLBCX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
Price$26.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.94M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.64
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMALX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. CMALX (146M). CMALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CMALX (3.94) vs RLBCX (1.57). CMALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CMALX (8 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CMALX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMALX (19.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMALX: RLBCX (250) vs CMALX (10000). CMALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. RLBCX (7.52). CMALX return over 5 years is better than : 58.49 vs. RLBCX (39.59).
| CMALX | RLBCX | CMALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.89 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.162 | 7.917 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 1.57 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.93 | 7.52 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.54 | 34.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.49 | 39.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers