Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMALX vs RLBCX
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CMALX vs RLBCX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
Price$26.81
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.97M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMALX is a Hold and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CMALX (169M). CMALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CMALX (4.10) vs RLBCX (1.44). CMALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CMALX (8 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). CMALX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMALX (19.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMALX: RLBCX (250) vs CMALX (10000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. CMALX (3.10). CMALX return over 5 years is better than : 40.91 vs. RLBCX (38.90).
| CMALX | RLBCX | CMALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.002 | 17.876 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.10 | 1.44 | 285% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 10.24 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.81 | 42.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.91 | 38.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers