CMAKY
Price
$5.57
Change
+$0.02 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
26.83B
FVCB
Price
$13.35
Change
-$0.18 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
241.35M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMAKY vs FVCB

Header iconCMAKY vs FVCB Comparison
Open Charts CMAKY vs FVCBBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$5.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.36%)
Volume$384
Capitalization26.83B
FVCBank
Price$13.35
Change-$0.18 (-1.33%)
Volume$117
Capitalization241.35M
CMAKY vs FVCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMAKY vs. FVCB commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAKY is a StrongBuy and FVCB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMAKY: $5.57 vs. FVCB: $13.53)
Brand notoriety: CMAKY and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMAKY: 38% vs. FVCB: 63%
Market capitalization -- CMAKY: $26.83B vs. FVCB: $241.35M
CMAKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.83B. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $241.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMAKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMAKY is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMAKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than CMAKY.

Price Growth

CMAKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.21% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMAKY($26.8B) has a higher market cap than FVCB($241M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than CMAKY: FVCB (12.05) vs CMAKY (6.03). CMAKY YTD gains are higher at: 46.738 vs. FVCB (8.127).
CMAKYFVCBCMAKY / FVCB
Capitalization26.8B241M11,120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.7388.127575%
P/E Ratio6.0312.0550%
RevenueN/A61M-
Total CashN/A13M-
Total DebtN/A26M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMAKY vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
CMAKY
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7359
SMR RATING
1..100
154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMAKY (92) in the null industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMAKY (73) in the null industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMAKY (45) in the null industry. This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMAKY’s stock grew significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAKYFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUMF12.650.24
+1.93%
FORTESCUE LTD.
FSRL9.80N/A
N/A
First Reliance Bancshares, Inc.
GUNGF21.15N/A
N/A
Gungho Online Entertainment Inc.
DSAIF0.07N/A
N/A
DEEPSPATIAL INC.
FOSUF0.50N/A
N/A
Fosun International, Ltd.

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
+0.36%
KFFB - CMAKY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - CMAKY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CMHF - CMAKY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CMAKY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+0.45%
MCBS - FVCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
PCB - FVCB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
HTB - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
PFIS - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
AROW - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More