CMA
Price
$68.86
Change
-$1.74 (-2.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.85B
40 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$27.03
Change
-$0.33 (-1.21%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.12B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs RF

Header iconCMA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs RFBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$68.86
Change-$1.74 (-2.46%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization8.85B
Regions Financial
Price$27.03
Change-$0.33 (-1.21%)
Volume$17.5M
Capitalization24.12B
CMA vs RF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. RF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Buy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $68.86 vs. RF: $27.03)
Brand notoriety: CMA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 54% vs. RF: 116%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $8.85B vs. RF: $24.12B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.85B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMA and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($24.1B) has a higher market cap than CMA($8.85B). CMA (13.22) and RF (12.63) have similar P/E ratio . RF YTD gains are higher at: 18.667 vs. CMA (14.146). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. CMA (1.08B). RF has less debt than CMA: RF (5.28B) vs CMA (8.69B).
CMARFCMA / RF
Capitalization8.85B24.1B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.14618.66776%
P/E Ratio13.2212.63105%
Revenue3.31BN/A-
Total Cash1.08B3.25B33%
Total Debt8.69B5.28B165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5921
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2014
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3752
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (78) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (88). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (59). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (9). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (20). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (52). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSJY44.570.24
+0.54%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF
UIVM61.030.29
+0.48%
VictoryShares International Val MomtETF
TMH54.600.15
+0.27%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION ADRHEDGED TMH
JSI52.840.13
+0.25%
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
EAFG21.45N/A
N/A
Pacer Developed Mkts Csh Cow Gr Ldr ETF

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
-2.46%
FNB - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
ZION - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
RF - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
KEY - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
WTFC - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
-1.21%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
PNC - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
More