CMA
Price
$67.89
Change
-$1.28 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.73B
60 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$25.60
Change
-$0.45 (-1.73%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
22.84B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs RF

Header iconCMA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs RFBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$67.89
Change-$1.28 (-1.85%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization8.73B
Regions Financial
Price$25.60
Change-$0.45 (-1.73%)
Volume$16.24M
Capitalization22.84B
CMA vs RF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. RF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $67.89 vs. RF: $25.60)
Brand notoriety: CMA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 67% vs. RF: 122%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $8.73B vs. RF: $22.84B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.73B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($22.8B) has a higher market cap than CMA($8.73B). CMA has higher P/E ratio than RF: CMA (13.03) vs RF (11.96). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 12.538 vs. RF (11.301). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.29B vs. CMA (1.08B). RF has less debt than CMA: RF (6.02B) vs CMA (8.69B). RF has higher revenues than CMA: RF (7.12B) vs CMA (3.31B).
CMARFCMA / RF
Capitalization8.73B22.8B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.53811.301111%
P/E Ratio13.0311.96109%
Revenue3.31B7.12B47%
Total Cash1.08B3.29B33%
Total Debt8.69B6.02B144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5076
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5623
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1417
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (88). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (56). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (9). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (17). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (50). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCH40.100.26
+0.66%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
OSEA29.340.14
+0.48%
Harbor International Compounders ETF
VIOO106.12-0.68
-0.64%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
SQLV41.85-0.85
-1.99%
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
STMZF14.34-0.35
-2.38%
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
-1.85%
RF - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
ZION - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
FNB - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
CFG - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
WTFC - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
-1.73%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CFG - RF
90%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
More