CMA
Price
$69.42
Change
+$0.53 (+0.77%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.92B
20 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$26.63
Change
+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
23.76B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs RF

Header iconCMA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs RFBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$69.42
Change+$0.53 (+0.77%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization8.92B
Regions Financial
Price$26.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$17.47M
Capitalization23.76B
CMA vs RF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. RF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a StrongBuy and RF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $69.42 vs. RF: $26.63)
Brand notoriety: CMA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 64% vs. RF: 99%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $8.92B vs. RF: $23.76B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.92B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($23.8B) has a higher market cap than CMA($8.92B). CMA has higher P/E ratio than RF: CMA (13.32) vs RF (12.44). RF (16.910) and CMA (16.246) have similar YTD gains . RF has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. CMA (1.24B). RF has less debt than CMA: RF (5.28B) vs CMA (8.69B).
CMARFCMA / RF
Capitalization8.92B23.8B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.24616.91096%
P/E Ratio13.3212.44107%
RevenueN/A7.29B-
Total Cash1.24B3.25B38%
Total Debt8.69B5.28B165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
878
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5823
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4550
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (88). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (58). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (9). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (47). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (50). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVR43.401.80
+4.33%
Sprott Silver Mnrs & Physical Silver ETF
TDI36.860.10
+0.27%
Touchstone Dynamic International ETF
CRED21.20N/A
N/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF
JEMA47.06-0.16
-0.34%
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders EM Eq ETF
PMM6.06-0.09
-1.46%
Putnam Managed Municipal Income

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.77%
CFG - CMA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
FNB - CMA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
KEY - CMA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
RF - CMA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
ZION - CMA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.11%
FITB - RF
92%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FNB - RF
92%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
CFG - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More