CMA vs PNFP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and PNFP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PNFP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PNFP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CMA | PNFP | CMA / PNFP | |
| Capitalization | 7.17B | 6.62B | 108% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.860 | 42.890 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.40 | 11.70 | 72% |
| Revenue | 3.59B | 1.38B | 260% |
| Total Cash | 1.44B | 229M | 630% |
| Total Debt | 9.77B | 2.56B | 381% |
CMA | PNFP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMA's Valuation (65) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (67) in the Major Banks industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
| CMA | PNFP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 70% |
CMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| ZION - CMA | 84% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| RF - CMA | 81% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ABCB - CMA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| PNFP - CMA | 80% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| OCFC - CMA | 79% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||
PNFP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNFP | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| HWC - PNFP | 89% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| SSB - PNFP | 89% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ONB - PNFP | 89% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| ASB - PNFP | 88% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| SNV - PNFP | 88% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||