CMA
Price
$78.11
Change
-$1.32 (-1.66%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LSBK
Price
$14.31
Change
-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
110.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs LSBK

Header iconCMA vs LSBK Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs LSBKBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$78.11
Change-$1.32 (-1.66%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization9.98B
Lake Shore Ban
Price$14.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Volume$24.32K
Capitalization110.04M
CMA vs LSBK Comparison Chart in %
CMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. LSBK commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a StrongBuy and LSBK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $79.43 vs. LSBK: $14.35)
Brand notoriety: CMA and LSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 98% vs. LSBK: 33%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $9.98B vs. LSBK: $110.04M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. LSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $110.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the long-term than LSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LSBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSBK is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.61% price change this week, while LSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($9.98B) has a higher market cap than LSBK($110M). CMA (14.93) and LSBK (14.91) have similar P/E ratio . CMA YTD gains are higher at: 33.008 vs. LSBK (7.122). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. LSBK (2.93M). LSBK has less debt than CMA: LSBK (2M) vs CMA (8.69B). CMA has higher revenues than LSBK: CMA (3.31B) vs LSBK (25.7M).
CMALSBKCMA / LSBK
Capitalization9.98B110M9,071%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.0087.122463%
P/E Ratio14.9314.91100%
Revenue3.31B25.7M12,895%
Total Cash1.24B2.93M42,344%
Total Debt8.69B2M434,350%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs LSBK: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
LSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5257
SMR RATING
1..100
1074
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSBK's Valuation (67) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (91) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (74) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (66) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMALSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HZNOF7.850.48
+6.51%
DEXTERRA GROUP INC.
BOUYY9.510.12
+1.22%
Bouygues SA
SSHPF0.22N/A
N/A
Vow ASA
SHCAY1.35-0.03
-2.53%
Sharp Corp.
OPHRF0.02N/A
-13.04%
OPHIR METALS CORP.

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.54%
CFG - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
FNB - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
WBS - CMA
83%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
WTFC - CMA
81%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
KEY - CMA
81%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
More

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSBK has been loosely correlated with MGYR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSBK jumps, then MGYR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
-0.28%
MGYR - LSBK
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
OPHC - LSBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
CFBK - LSBK
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
CMA - LSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
HBCP - LSBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
More