CMA
Price
$67.99
Change
+$0.51 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.17B
82 days until earnings call
FHN
Price
$22.81
Change
+$0.59 (+2.66%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.55B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs FHN

Header iconCMA vs FHN Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs FHNBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$67.99
Change+$0.51 (+0.76%)
Volume$3.55M
Capitalization7.17B
First Horizon
Price$22.81
Change+$0.59 (+2.66%)
Volume$12M
Capitalization8.55B
CMA vs FHN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. FHN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a StrongBuy and FHN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $67.99 vs. FHN: $22.81)
Brand notoriety: CMA and FHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 181% vs. FHN: 191%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $7.17B vs. FHN: $8.55B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.17B. FHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while FHN (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN($8.55B) has a higher market cap than CMA($7.17B). FHN has higher P/E ratio than CMA: FHN (9.71) vs CMA (8.40). FHN YTD gains are higher at: 15.056 vs. CMA (12.704). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. FHN (1.01B). FHN has less debt than CMA: FHN (1.48B) vs CMA (9.77B). CMA has higher revenues than FHN: CMA (3.59B) vs FHN (3.16B).
CMAFHNCMA / FHN
Capitalization7.17B8.55B84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.70415.05684%
P/E Ratio8.409.7186%
Revenue3.59B3.16B114%
Total Cash1.44B1.01B143%
Total Debt9.77B1.48B662%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs FHN: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5440
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHN's Valuation (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (83) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (54) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHN (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHN’s over the last 12 months.

FHN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAFHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUSC42.280.31
+0.74%
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
STAX25.41N/A
N/A
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
LIAK194.65N/A
N/A
LifeX 2054 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
MINV32.93-0.10
-0.29%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
EOT16.12-0.10
-0.62%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.76%
FNB - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
FHN - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
BKU - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
ABCB - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FITB - CMA
82%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More

FHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHN has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHN jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHN
1D Price
Change %
FHN100%
+2.66%
FNB - FHN
91%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
WTFC - FHN
90%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
SNV - FHN
90%
Closely correlated
-12.54%
ZION - FHN
90%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
HBAN - FHN
89%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
More