CM
Price
$64.37
Change
+$0.59 (+0.93%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
66 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$29.78
Change
-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CM vs UBS

Header iconCM vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts CM vs UBSBanner chart's image
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Price$64.37
Change+$0.59 (+0.93%)
Volume$845.31K
CapitalizationN/A
UBS Group AG
Price$29.78
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$2.3M
CapitalizationN/A
CM vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CM vs. UBS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CM is a Hold and UBS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CM: $64.37 vs. UBS: $29.78)
Brand notoriety: CM and UBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CM: 96% vs. UBS: 168%
Market capitalization -- CM: $47.37B vs. UBS: $98.65B
CM [@Major Banks] is valued at $47.37B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CM and UBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CM and UBS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CM (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.69% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -6.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CM is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBS($98.7B) has a higher market cap than CM($47.4B). CM has higher P/E ratio than UBS: CM (10.41) vs UBS (3.61). CM YTD gains are higher at: 33.714 vs. UBS (-1.088). CM has less debt than UBS: CM (190B) vs UBS (378B). UBS has higher revenues than CM: UBS (39.4B) vs CM (23.6B).
CMUBSCM / UBS
Capitalization47.4B98.7B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.714-1.088-3,099%
P/E Ratio10.413.61289%
Revenue23.6B39.4B60%
Total CashN/A144B-
Total Debt190B378B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CM vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
CM
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7497
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
456
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4371
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBS's Valuation (50) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CM (85) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CM’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CM (45) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CM’s over the last 12 months.

CM's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as UBS (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

CM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as UBS (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CM (44) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CM has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CM jumps, then RY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CM
1D Price
Change %
CM100%
+0.93%
RY - CM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BNS - CM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
BMO - CM
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
HSBC - CM
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
UBS - CM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then RY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-0.10%
RY - UBS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
MUFG - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
BMO - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SMFG - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BNS - UBS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More