CLYYF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.12 (-22.64%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
16.13M
WHWK
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
90.49M
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLYYF vs WHWK

Header iconCLYYF vs WHWK Comparison
Open Charts CLYYF vs WHWKBanner chart's image
Celyad Oncology SA
Price$0.41
Change-$0.12 (-22.64%)
Volume$600
Capitalization16.13M
Whitehawk Therapeutics
Price$1.92
Change+$0.02 (+1.05%)
Volume$36.73K
Capitalization90.49M
CLYYF vs WHWK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLYYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLYYF vs. WHWK commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLYYF is a Hold and WHWK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CLYYF: $0.41 vs. WHWK: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: CLYYF and WHWK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLYYF: 90% vs. WHWK: 36%
Market capitalization -- CLYYF: $16.13M vs. WHWK: $90.49M
CLYYF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $16.13M. WHWK’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $90.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $97.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLYYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLYYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHWK is a better buy in the long-term than CLYYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLYYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHWK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLYYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WHWK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHWK is a better buy in the short-term than CLYYF.

Price Growth

CLYYF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHWK (@Biotechnology) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHWK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+2.75% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHWK($90.5M) has a higher market cap than CLYYF($16.1M). CLYYF YTD gains are higher at: 67.347 vs. WHWK (-39.144).
CLYYFWHWKCLYYF / WHWK
Capitalization16.1M90.5M18%
EBITDAN/A-10.21M-
Gain YTD67.347-39.144-172%
P/E RatioN/A11.67-
RevenueN/A21.6M-
Total CashN/A177M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLYYF vs WHWK: Fundamental Ratings
CLYYF
WHWK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3780
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHWK's Valuation (37) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLYYF (76) in the null industry. This means that WHWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLYYF’s over the last 12 months.

WHWK's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CLYYF (100) in the null industry. This means that WHWK’s stock grew similarly to CLYYF’s over the last 12 months.

WHWK's SMR Rating (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CLYYF (99) in the null industry. This means that WHWK’s stock grew similarly to CLYYF’s over the last 12 months.

WHWK's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CLYYF (60) in the null industry. This means that WHWK’s stock grew similarly to CLYYF’s over the last 12 months.

WHWK's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLYYF (100) in the null industry. This means that WHWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLYYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLYYFWHWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLYYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZZTF0.200.01
+4.16%
Aztec Minerals Corp
SNPW1.44N/A
N/A
Sun Pacific Holding Corp.
LBGUF45.79N/A
N/A
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
NCTKF22.77N/A
N/A
Nabtesco Corp.
HAOTF0.14N/A
N/A
HAO TIAN INTL CONSTR INVT GROUP LTD.

CLYYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLYYF has been loosely correlated with ELVAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLYYF jumps, then ELVAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLYYF
1D Price
Change %
CLYYF100%
N/A
ELVAF - CLYYF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WHWK - CLYYF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
HLVX - CLYYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REPL - CLYYF
25%
Poorly correlated
+32.42%
WXXWY - CLYYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

WHWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHWK has been closely correlated with ELVAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WHWK jumps, then ELVAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHWK
1D Price
Change %
WHWK100%
+1.05%
ELVAF - WHWK
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
DMAC - WHWK
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
TRAW - WHWK
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
CLYYF - WHWK
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RNTX - WHWK
33%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
More