CLX
Price
$111.41
Change
+$2.55 (+2.34%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
13.59B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$65.33
Change
+$0.63 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
139.78B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLX vs UL

Header iconCLX vs UL Comparison
Open Charts CLX vs ULBanner chart's image
Clorox
Price$111.41
Change+$2.55 (+2.34%)
Volume$2.15M
Capitalization13.59B
Unilever
Price$65.33
Change+$0.63 (+0.97%)
Volume$2.66M
Capitalization139.78B
CLX vs UL Comparison Chart in %
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLX vs. UL commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLX is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CLX: $111.41 vs. UL: $65.33)
Brand notoriety: CLX and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLX: 93% vs. UL: 104%
Market capitalization -- CLX: $13.59B vs. UL: $139.78B
CLX [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $13.59B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $139.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the long-term than CLX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than CLX.

Price Growth

CLX (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +9.48% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +4.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+3.88% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($140B) has a higher market cap than CLX($13.6B). UL has higher P/E ratio than CLX: UL (22.27) vs CLX (17.49). CLX YTD gains are higher at: 10.493 vs. UL (-0.107). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. CLX (1.32B). UL has higher revenues than CLX: UL (59.8B) vs CLX (6.77B).
CLXULCLX / UL
Capitalization13.6B140B10%
EBITDA1.32B11.3B12%
Gain YTD10.493-0.107-9,803%
P/E Ratio17.4922.2779%
Revenue6.77B59.8B11%
Total Cash166MN/A-
Total Debt3.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLX vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
CLX
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLX's Valuation (23) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (27). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (100). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's SMR Rating (3) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that CLX’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (62). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (99). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLXUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVEM81.050.49
+0.61%
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
CBOA26.270.10
+0.37%
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April
EYEG35.940.09
+0.25%
AB Corporate Bond ETF
BGX11.73-0.01
-0.09%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
BOIL16.47-2.13
-11.45%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

CLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLX has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLX jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLX
1D Price
Change %
CLX100%
+2.34%
PG - CLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CL - CLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CHD - CLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
KMB - CLX
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
SPB - CLX
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
+0.97%
PG - UL
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CL - UL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CHD - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
CLX - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
BDRFY - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
More