CLX
Price
$104.01
Change
+$1.18 (+1.15%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
12.69B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$64.94
Change
+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
141.69B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLX vs UL

Header iconCLX vs UL Comparison
Open Charts CLX vs ULBanner chart's image
Clorox
Price$104.01
Change+$1.18 (+1.15%)
Volume$1.44M
Capitalization12.69B
Unilever
Price$64.94
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Volume$2.64M
Capitalization141.69B
CLX vs UL Comparison Chart in %
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLX vs. UL commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLX is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CLX: $102.83 vs. UL: $64.82)
Brand notoriety: CLX and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLX: 76% vs. UL: 157%
Market capitalization -- CLX: $12.69B vs. UL: $141.69B
CLX [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $12.69B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $141.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $333.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLX and UL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLX is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

CLX (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.16% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLX is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.77% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($142B) has a higher market cap than CLX($12.7B). UL has higher P/E ratio than CLX: UL (22.03) vs CLX (16.33). UL YTD gains are higher at: 5.126 vs. CLX (-34.308). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. CLX (1.32B). UL has higher revenues than CLX: UL (59.8B) vs CLX (6.77B).
CLXULCLX / UL
Capitalization12.7B142B9%
EBITDA1.32B11.3B12%
Gain YTD-34.3085.126-669%
P/E Ratio16.3322.0374%
Revenue6.77B59.8B11%
Total Cash166MN/A-
Total Debt3.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLX vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
CLX
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLX's Valuation (21) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (27). This means that CLX’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (100). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's SMR Rating (2) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96). This means that CLX’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLX (64). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (99). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLXUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURE108.502.92
+2.77%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
BBP78.371.01
+1.30%
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
IQDG41.310.30
+0.73%
WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF
ZJAN27.25N/A
N/A
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
EEM54.88-0.26
-0.47%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

CLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLX has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLX jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLX
1D Price
Change %
CLX100%
+0.30%
PG - CLX
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CHD - CLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CL - CLX
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
KMB - CLX
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
SPB - CLX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
+1.50%
PG - UL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CL - UL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CHD - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CLX - UL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
BDRFY - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More