Advertisement
CLWT vs NPO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWT is a Hold and NPO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLWT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLWT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLWT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLWT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLWT (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -5.65% price change this week, while NPO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
NPO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-1.30% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CLWT | NPO | CLWT / NPO | |
| Capitalization | 10.8M | 3.46B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 1.32M | 177M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -15.827 | 9.369 | -169% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.00 | 323.61 | 11% |
| Revenue | 21.4M | 1.06B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 5.27M | 370M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 592K | 657M | 0% |
CLWT | NPO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLWT's Valuation (51) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NPO (71) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLWT (79) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NPO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLWT’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's SMR Rating (78) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NPO (81) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLWT (82) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NPO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLWT’s over the last 12 months.
CLWT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for NPO (90) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CLWT’s stock grew significantly faster than NPO’s over the last 12 months.
| CLWT | NPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COPJ | 23.97 | 0.30 | +1.27% |
| Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | |||
| IBTM | 22.69 | -0.07 | -0.31% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Trs ETF | |||
| GOVI | 27.08 | -0.18 | -0.66% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
| FNDE | 32.55 | -0.39 | -1.18% |
| Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF | |||
| AVXC | 55.06 | -0.79 | -1.41% |
| Avantis Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Eq ETF | |||
CLWT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLWT and MRSKF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLWT and MRSKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLWT | 100% | -4.10% | ||
| MRSKF - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMI - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| ETN - CLWT | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| ROK - CLWT | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| NPO - CLWT | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||
NPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPO has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NPO jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.