Advertisement
CLWT vs MRSKF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWT is a Hold and MRSKF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLWT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRSKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLWT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLWT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRSKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLWT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MRSKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CLWT (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а +1.63% price change this week, while MRSKF (@Tools & Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Specialties (-0.68% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
@Tools & Hardware (+1.36% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| CLWT | MRSKF | CLWT / MRSKF | |
| Capitalization | 9.52M | 3.37B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.072 | 27.257 | -37% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.50 | 46.61 | 27% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 368K | N/A | - |
CLWT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLWT | MRSKF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 9% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 7% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 17% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 18% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 6% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSIQX | 11.93 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq I | |||
| HFMDX | 22.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Inv | |||
| FKACX | 34.18 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| Franklin Growth Opportunities C | |||
| VTSAX | 154.04 | -0.41 | -0.27% |
| Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm | |||
| NESIX | 19.54 | -0.16 | -0.81% |
| Needham Small Cap Growth Institutional | |||
CLWT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLWT and MRSKF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLWT and MRSKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLWT | 100% | +5.04% | ||
| MRSKF - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMI - CLWT | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| ETN - CLWT | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| NPO - CLWT | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ZWS - CLWT | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||
MRSKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRSKF has been loosely correlated with PRPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRSKF jumps, then PRPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRSKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRPI - MRSKF | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CVV - MRSKF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| CLWT - MRSKF | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.04% | ||
| KMAAF - MRSKF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCRUF - MRSKF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||