Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$80.05
Change-$8.68 (-9.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CLWFX (6.24B). CLWFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. RGACX (2.06). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.24 vs. RGACX (11.01).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.698 | -1.046 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 2.06 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 42.58 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.24 | 11.01 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.73 | 113.97 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers