Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$83.27
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CLWFX (6.54B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. CLWFX (4.43). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.79 vs. RGACX (20.43).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.439 | 8.821 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 5.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.55 | 63.36 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.79 | 20.43 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.56 | 92.34 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement