Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs RGACX
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$85.54
Change+$0.56 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CLWFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CLWFX (6.35B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.71). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLWFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX (17.83) and CLWFX (17.28) have marching annual gain over last year. CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.32 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| CLWFX | RGACX | CLWFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.665 | 15.516 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.28 | 17.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.32 | 58.53 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.32 | 40.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | 95.93 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement