Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs GFFFX
CLWFX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs GFFFX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$85.54
Change+$0.56 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CLWFX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CLWFX (6.35B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: GFFFX (0.51) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CLWFX (15 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CLWFX (0.71) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: CLWFX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. CLWFX (17.28). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.32 vs. GFFFX (43.50).
| CLWFX | GFFFX | CLWFX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.40 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.40 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.665 | 15.936 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.28 | 18.73 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.32 | 60.96 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.32 | 43.50 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | 101.61 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement