Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs GFACX
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs GFACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$90.28
Change-$0.16 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.08
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CLWFX (6.62B). CLWFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.71). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CLWFX (0) vs GFACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.04 vs. GFACX (4.93). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.38 vs. GFACX (23.08).
| CLWFX | GFACX | CLWFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.36 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.36 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.346 | 18.115 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 4.93 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.59 | 54.70 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.38 | 23.08 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.50 | 74.33 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement