Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLWFX vs GFACX
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs GFACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
Price$80.05
Change-$8.68 (-9.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CLWFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. GFACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CLWFX (6.24B). CLWFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLWFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLWFX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLWFX (0.70). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CLWFX (0) vs GFACX (250). CLWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. GFACX (0.14). CLWFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.24 vs. GFACX (4.02).
| CLWFX | GFACX | CLWFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.698 | -1.085 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 0.14 | 2,313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 36.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.24 | 4.02 | 977% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.73 | 93.69 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers