It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +2.04% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.
CLW is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
CLW | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLW | RWX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 17 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago73% | 4 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLW has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLW jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLW | 100% | +0.41% | ||
SLVM - CLW | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
MERC - CLW | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
MAGN - CLW | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
SUZ - CLW | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
ITP - CLW | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWX has been loosely correlated with LAND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RWX jumps, then LAND could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RWX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RWX | 100% | +1.31% | ||
LAND - RWX | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
LEG - RWX | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
BLND - RWX | 23% Poorly correlated | +10.41% | ||
HMN - RWX | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
CLW - RWX | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More |