CLW
Price
$30.13
Change
+$0.28 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
718.86M
31 days until earnings call
MAGN
Price
$13.18
Change
+$0.11 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
90.3M
122 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLW vs MAGN

Header iconCLW vs MAGN Comparison
Open Charts CLW vs MAGNBanner chart's image
Clearwater Paper
Price$30.13
Change+$0.28 (+0.94%)
Volume$70.84K
Capitalization718.86M
Magnera
Price$13.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.84%)
Volume$397.1K
Capitalization90.3M
CLW vs MAGN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLW vs. MAGN commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLW is a Buy and MAGN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLW: $30.13 vs. MAGN: $13.18)
Brand notoriety: CLW and MAGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLW: 32% vs. MAGN: 46%
Market capitalization -- CLW: $718.86M vs. MAGN: $90.3M
CLW [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $718.86M. MAGN’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $90.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAGN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLW and MAGN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLW’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAGN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAGN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLW is a better buy in the short-term than MAGN.

Price Growth

CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +7.68% price change this week, while MAGN (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

MAGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.96% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLW($719M) has a higher market cap than MAGN($90.3M). MAGN has higher P/E ratio than CLW: MAGN (58.82) vs CLW (6.92). CLW YTD gains are higher at: 1.209 vs. MAGN (-27.463). CLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 274M vs. MAGN (56.9M). MAGN has more cash in the bank: 50.3M vs. CLW (42M). CLW has less debt than MAGN: CLW (478M) vs MAGN (865M). CLW has higher revenues than MAGN: CLW (2.08B) vs MAGN (1.39B).
CLWMAGNCLW / MAGN
Capitalization719M90.3M796%
EBITDA274M56.9M482%
Gain YTD1.209-27.463-4%
P/E Ratio6.9258.8212%
Revenue2.08B1.39B150%
Total Cash42M50.3M83%
Total Debt478M865M55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLW vs MAGN: Fundamental Ratings
CLW
MAGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
855
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGN's Valuation (6) in the Pulp And Paper industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLW (97). This means that MAGN’s stock grew significantly faster than CLW’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (100). This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's SMR Rating (41) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAGN (96). This means that CLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (64). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (10). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLWMAGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDAB18.060.06
+0.36%
Coeur D Alene Bancorp
BKQNY10.20N/A
N/A
Bank of Queensland Ltd.
PROM0.90N/A
N/A
Propel Media, Inc.
STRYF5.68N/A
N/A
Storytel AB
TNABF3.35-0.10
-2.90%
Tenaga Nasional Berhad

CLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLW and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLW and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLW
1D Price
Change %
CLW100%
+0.94%
SLVM - CLW
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
MERC - CLW
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
MAGN - CLW
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
ITP - CLW
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
SUZ - CLW
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

MAGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGN and SUZ have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGN and SUZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGN
1D Price
Change %
MAGN100%
+0.84%
SUZ - MAGN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
SLVM - MAGN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
MERC - MAGN
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
CLW - MAGN
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
ITP - MAGN
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%