Advertisement
CLW vs ITP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLW is a Hold and ITP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ITP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -3.93% price change this week, while ITP (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLW is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-0.93% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| CLW | ITP | CLW / ITP | |
| Capitalization | 347M | 3.43M | 10,125% |
| EBITDA | 41.3M | 6.21M | 665% |
| Gain YTD | -27.645 | -66.412 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 1454.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.55B | 79.9M | 1,940% |
| Total Cash | 46.7M | 4.03M | 1,158% |
| Total Debt | 341M | 10.2M | 3,343% |
CLW | ITP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ITP's Valuation (63) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLW (97). This means that ITP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLW’s over the last 12 months.
ITP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (100). This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's SMR Rating (36) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITP (93). This means that CLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.
ITP's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (90). This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Pulp And Paper industry is significantly better than the same rating for ITP (97). This means that CLW’s stock grew significantly faster than ITP’s over the last 12 months.
| CLW | ITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
CLW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLW has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLW jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLW | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| SLVM - CLW | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| MERC - CLW | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| MAGN - CLW | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
| SUZ - CLW | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| ITP - CLW | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
More | ||||
ITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and CFPUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and CFPUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITP | 100% | +2.28% | ||
| CFPUF - ITP | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLW - ITP | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| LMPMF - ITP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MERC - ITP | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| SUZ - ITP | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||