Advertisement
CLVT vs JKHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLVT is a Hold and JKHY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLVT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJKHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLVT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- JKHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLVT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JKHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLVT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- JKHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLVT (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +11.66% price change this week, while JKHY (@Information Technology Services) price change was -0.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLVT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
JKHY is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-0.55% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| CLVT | JKHY | CLVT / JKHY | |
| Capitalization | 2.9B | 11.7B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 685M | 773M | 89% |
| Gain YTD | -15.157 | -7.912 | 192% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.32 | - |
| Revenue | 2.5B | 2.32B | 108% |
| Total Cash | 352M | 39.9M | 882% |
| Total Debt | 4.59B | 170M | 2,698% |
CLVT | JKHY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JKHY's Valuation (15) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLVT (54) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that JKHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
JKHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLVT (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that JKHY’s stock grew similarly to CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
JKHY's SMR Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLVT (94) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that JKHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLVT’s over the last 12 months.
CLVT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JKHY (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLVT’s stock grew similarly to JKHY’s over the last 12 months.
CLVT's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as JKHY (71) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLVT’s stock grew similarly to JKHY’s over the last 12 months.
| CLVT | JKHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EFT | 12.09 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | |||
| PSMJ | 30.97 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | |||
| IBDW | 21.06 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
| FBUF | 28.96 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | |||
| RSSE | 20.76 | -0.06 | -0.29% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Sep | |||
CLVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLVT has been loosely correlated with DXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLVT jumps, then DXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVT | 100% | N/A | ||
| DXC - CLVT | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| GIB - CLVT | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| JKHY - CLVT | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| VYX - CLVT | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| ACN - CLVT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
JKHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JKHY has been loosely correlated with FIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JKHY jumps, then FIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JKHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JKHY | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| FIS - JKHY | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| BR - JKHY | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| GDYN - JKHY | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.63% | ||
| DXC - JKHY | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ACN - JKHY | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||