CLVSF
Price
$19.28
Change
-$6.63 (-25.59%)
Updated
Jan 23 closing price
Capitalization
460.55M
SHC
Price
$16.16
Change
-$0.17 (-1.04%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.59B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLVSF vs SHC

Header iconCLVSF vs SHC Comparison
Open Charts CLVSF vs SHCBanner chart's image
Cellavision AB
Price$19.28
Change-$6.63 (-25.59%)
Volume$157
Capitalization460.55M
Sotera Health
Price$16.16
Change-$0.17 (-1.04%)
Volume$891.78K
Capitalization4.59B
CLVSF vs SHC Comparison Chart in %
SHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLVSF vs. SHC commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLVSF is a Hold and SHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CLVSF: $19.28 vs. SHC: $16.16)
Brand notoriety: CLVSF and SHC are both not notable
CLVSF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while SHC is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLVSF: 100% vs. SHC: 47%
Market capitalization -- CLVSF: $460.55M vs. SHC: $4.59B
CLVSF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $460.55M. SHC’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $4.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $223.72B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $11.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLVSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLVSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHC is a better buy in the long-term than CLVSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CLVSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHC (@Medical Specialties) price change was +5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.22% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Medical Specialties (+0.25% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHC($4.59B) has a higher market cap than CLVSF($461M). SHC has higher P/E ratio than CLVSF: SHC (179.56) vs CLVSF (31.15). SHC YTD gains are higher at: 18.129 vs. CLVSF (-25.576). SHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 415M vs. CLVSF (197M). SHC has more cash in the bank: 332M vs. CLVSF (155M). CLVSF has less debt than SHC: CLVSF (30.2M) vs SHC (2.35B). SHC has higher revenues than CLVSF: SHC (1.13B) vs CLVSF (751M).
CLVSFSHCCLVSF / SHC
Capitalization461M4.59B10%
EBITDA197M415M47%
Gain YTD-25.57618.129-141%
P/E Ratio31.15179.5617%
Revenue751M1.13B67%
Total Cash155M332M47%
Total Debt30.2M2.35B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLVSF: Fundamental Ratings
CLVSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLVSFSHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RETTX30.700.14
+0.46%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs M
TIQRX47.430.21
+0.44%
Nuveen Equity Index R
LCLAX57.770.16
+0.28%
ClearBridge Select A
IEYYX10.56-0.05
-0.47%
Macquarie Climate Solutions Y
ROFRX14.59-0.08
-0.55%
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity R

CLVSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLVSF and PSNL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLVSF and PSNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLVSF
1D Price
Change %
CLVSF100%
N/A
PSNL - CLVSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.19%
BDSX - CLVSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-7.63%
SHC - CLVSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
AVHHL - CLVSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMKDF - CLVSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHC has been loosely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHC jumps, then A could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHC
1D Price
Change %
SHC100%
-1.04%
A - SHC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
RVTY - SHC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
MTD - SHC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
TMO - SHC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CNMD - SHC
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More