Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLTAX vs CRAZX
CLTAX vs CRAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLTAX vs. CRAZX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLTAX is a Hold and CRAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. CLTAX (18.3M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than CLTAX: CRAZX (2.20) vs CLTAX (0.02). CLTAX was incepted earlier than CRAZX: CLTAX (13 years) vs CRAZX (13 years). CLTAX (2.09) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 186.00 vs. CLTAX (69.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLTAX: CRAZX (2000) vs CLTAX (2500). CLTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. CRAZX (10.53). CRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.16 vs. CLTAX (5.36).
| CLTAX | CRAZX | CLTAX / CRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.81 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.81 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.242 | 14.481 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3M | 2.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 2.20 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.90 | 10.53 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | 30.91 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.36 | 9.16 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.33 | 43.01 | 75% |