CLST
Price
$13.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
54.22M
NBGIF
Price
$14.87
Change
+$0.76 (+5.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
12.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs NBGIF

Header iconCLST vs NBGIF Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs NBGIFBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$13.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization54.22M
National Bank of Greece S.A
Price$14.87
Change+$0.76 (+5.39%)
Volume$370
Capitalization12.98B
CLST vs NBGIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. NBGIF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a Hold and NBGIF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $13.10 vs. NBGIF: $14.87)
Brand notoriety: CLST and NBGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 41% vs. NBGIF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $54.22M vs. NBGIF: $12.98B
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $54.22M. NBGIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGIF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBGIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while NBGIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIF($13B) has a higher market cap than CLST($54.2M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than NBGIF: CLST (23.82) vs NBGIF (10.54). NBGIF YTD gains are higher at: 87.990 vs. CLST (11.295). CLST has less debt than NBGIF: CLST (9.65M) vs NBGIF (3.7B). NBGIF has higher revenues than CLST: NBGIF (2.77B) vs CLST (11.6M).
CLSTNBGIFCLST / NBGIF
Capitalization54.2M13B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.29587.99013%
P/E Ratio23.8210.54226%
Revenue11.6M2.77B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.65M3.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs NBGIF: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
NBGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
123
SMR RATING
1..100
879
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBGIF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (80). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (12). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (87). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (49). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (40). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTNBGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMHG51.250.28
+0.55%
Prime Meridian Holding Co.
ARGC2.50N/A
N/A
Arion Group Corp.
DPLMF75.20N/A
N/A
Diploma Plc.
EXALF125.00N/A
N/A
EXAIL TECHNOLOGIES
DNQUF10.42N/A
N/A
Denali Capital Acquisition Corp.

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with COFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then COFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
-0.38%
COFS - CLST
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
UBFO - CLST
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
CARE - CLST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
PNC - CLST
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
NEWT - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
More

NBGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGIF and ALBKY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGIF and ALBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBGIF
1D Price
Change %
NBGIF100%
N/A
ALBKY - NBGIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
HACBY - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - NBGIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
CLST - NBGIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ISNPY - NBGIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More