CLST
Price
$12.38
Change
+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
53.99M
NBGIF
Price
$14.29
Change
-$0.35 (-2.39%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs NBGIF

Header iconCLST vs NBGIF Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs NBGIFBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$12.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Volume$357
Capitalization53.99M
National Bank of Greece S.A
Price$14.29
Change-$0.35 (-2.39%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization6.31B
CLST vs NBGIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. NBGIF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a Hold and NBGIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $12.38 vs. NBGIF: $14.28)
Brand notoriety: CLST and NBGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 4% vs. NBGIF: 23%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $53.99M vs. NBGIF: $6.31B
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.99M. NBGIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBGIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while NBGIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIF($6.31B) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than NBGIF: CLST (84.57) vs NBGIF (5.69). NBGIF YTD gains are higher at: 80.594 vs. CLST (5.183). NBGIF has higher revenues than CLST: NBGIF (2.3B) vs CLST (9.14M).
CLSTNBGIFCLST / NBGIF
Capitalization54M6.31B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.18380.5946%
P/E Ratio84.575.691,488%
Revenue9.14M2.3B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.85B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs NBGIF: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
NBGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
124
SMR RATING
1..100
849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLST's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBGIF (69). This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBGIF’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (12). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (84). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (55). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (53). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTNBGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBSTF0.130.04
+50.96%
THE CANNABIST COMPANY HOLDINGS INC.
ASEKF10.08N/A
N/A
Aisin Corporation
BDGSF55.65N/A
N/A
Bank of Ga Group Plc
GRRLF0.12N/A
N/A
Grange Resources Ltd.
IONGF0.03N/A
N/A
Lithium ION Energy Ltd.

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLST and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLST and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
+0.24%
UBFO - CLST
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEWT - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARE - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
PNC - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
ACNB - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

NBGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGIF and ALBKY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGIF and ALBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBGIF
1D Price
Change %
NBGIF100%
-2.36%
ALBKY - NBGIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
HACBY - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - NBGIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CLST - NBGIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ISNPY - NBGIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More