CLST
Price
$12.48
Change
-$0.24 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
53.99M
NBGIF
Price
$12.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs NBGIF

Header iconCLST vs NBGIF Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs NBGIFBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$12.48
Change-$0.24 (-1.89%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization53.99M
National Bank of Greece S.A
Price$12.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$80.17K
Capitalization6.31B
CLST vs NBGIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. NBGIF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a Buy and NBGIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $12.48 vs. NBGIF: $12.85)
Brand notoriety: CLST and NBGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 11% vs. NBGIF: 1569%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $53.99M vs. NBGIF: $6.31B
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.99M. NBGIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBGIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBGIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NBGIF is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBGIF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NBGIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLST is a better buy in the short-term than NBGIF.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while NBGIF (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIF($6.31B) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than NBGIF: CLST (84.57) vs NBGIF (5.69). NBGIF YTD gains are higher at: 62.453 vs. CLST (6.032). NBGIF has higher revenues than CLST: NBGIF (2.3B) vs CLST (9.14M).
CLSTNBGIFCLST / NBGIF
Capitalization54M6.31B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.03262.45310%
P/E Ratio84.575.691,488%
Revenue9.14M2.3B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.85B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs NBGIF: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
NBGIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
115
SMR RATING
1..100
849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLST's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as NBGIF (56). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to NBGIF’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (11). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (84). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (51). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

NBGIF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (50). This means that NBGIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTNBGIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBGIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFOG43.940.57
+1.31%
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
IDV34.880.12
+0.35%
iShares International Select Div ETF
GMUB49.78-0.01
-0.01%
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
CSHI49.76-0.02
-0.04%
NEOS Enhanced Income CA Alt ETF
TAFL24.29-0.02
-0.07%
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
-1.86%
UBFO - CLST
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
CARE - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
ACNB - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NEWT - CLST
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
PNC - CLST
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

NBGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBGIF and ALBKY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBGIF and ALBKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBGIF
1D Price
Change %
NBGIF100%
-0.03%
ALBKY - NBGIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.33%
HACBY - NBGIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBY - NBGIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
CLST - NBGIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
ISNPY - NBGIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More