Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSM vs UPAR
CLSM vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CLSM vs UPAR
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
Volume$100
Net Assets112.53M
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$14.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$700
Net Assets58.99M
CLSM vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSM vs. UPAR commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSM is a StrongBuy and UPAR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 113M vs. UPAR (59M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSM: UPAR (17.579) vs CLSM (9.916). CLSM was incepted earlier than UPAR: CLSM (4 years) vs UPAR (4 years). UPAR (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.79). CLSM has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CLSM | UPAR | CLSM / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.916 | 17.579 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 113M | 59M | 192% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Turnover | 401.00 | 12.00 | 3,342% |
| Yield | 1.95 | 3.61 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSM | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+-13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | -13% Poorly correlated | -4.36% |
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UPAR and CCO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPAR and CCO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| CCO - UPAR | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
| CNH - UPAR | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FSLR - UPAR | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| FERG - UPAR | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CF - UPAR | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||