Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSM vs RULE
CLSM vs RULE Comparison
Open Charts CLSM vs RULE
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
Volume$31.66K
Net Assets116.31M
Adaptive Core ETF
Price$22.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.77K
Net Assets12.96M
CLSM vs RULE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSM vs. RULE commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSM is a Buy and RULE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 116M vs. RULE (13M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than RULE: CLSM (9.278) vs RULE (3.762). CLSM was incepted earlier than RULE: CLSM (4 years) vs RULE (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than RULE (1.22). RULE has a higher turnover CLSM (401.00) vs CLSM (401.00).
| CLSM | RULE | CLSM / RULE | |
| Gain YTD | 9.278 | 3.762 | 247% |
| Net Assets | 116M | 13M | 892% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.22 | 65% |
| Turnover | 401.00 | 451.00 | 89% |
| Yield | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSM | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 21 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+-13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | -13% Poorly correlated | +4.08% |
RULE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RULE has been closely correlated with HWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RULE jumps, then HWM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RULE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RULE | 100% | N/A | ||
| HWM - RULE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| GE - RULE | 68% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| JPM - RULE | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| DASH - RULE | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MA - RULE | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||