FIG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLSM | FIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 15% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 18% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 32% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 29% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 19% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -10.88% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FIG and NATL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIG and NATL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG | 100% | -10.88% | ||
| NATL - FIG | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
| CCRD - FIG | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TYL - FIG | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.50% | ||
| ROP - FIG | 3% Poorly correlated | -6.38% | ||
| PEGA - FIG | 3% Poorly correlated | -8.47% | ||
More | ||||