CLSK
Price
$10.91
Change
-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YALA
Price
$7.17
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs YALA

Header iconCLSK vs YALA Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs YALABanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$10.91
Change-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Volume$16.51M
Capitalization2.79B
Yalla Group
Price$7.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$278.01K
Capitalization1.13B
CLSK vs YALA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. YALA commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and YALA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $10.91 vs. YALA: $7.17)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and YALA are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while YALA is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 52% vs. YALA: 73%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.79B vs. YALA: $1.13B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.79B. YALA’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYALA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YALA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YALA is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YALA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YALA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YALA is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.31% price change this week, while YALA (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

YALA is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.79B) has a higher market cap than YALA($1.13B). CLSK has higher P/E ratio than YALA: CLSK (9.74) vs YALA (8.74). YALA YTD gains are higher at: 76.601 vs. CLSK (18.458). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 763M vs. YALA (127M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. YALA (738M). YALA has less debt than CLSK: YALA (489K) vs CLSK (824M). CLSK has higher revenues than YALA: CLSK (766M) vs YALA (349M).
CLSKYALACLSK / YALA
Capitalization2.79B1.13B247%
EBITDA763M127M601%
Gain YTD18.45876.60124%
P/E Ratio9.748.74111%
Revenue766M349M219%
Total Cash1.01B738M137%
Total Debt824M489K168,507%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKYALA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YALA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNGTX69.550.31
+0.45%
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt D
TRPBX25.200.03
+0.12%
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Allc Inv
JEQIX40.280.01
+0.02%
Johnson Equity Income
MOWNX20.72-0.01
-0.05%
Moerus Worldwide Value N
TFCGX22.12-0.10
-0.45%
Taylor Frigon Core Growth

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-4.30%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BITF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-7.12%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More

YALA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YALA has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YALA jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YALA
1D Price
Change %
YALA100%
+0.14%
COIN - YALA
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
CLSK - YALA
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
RIOT - YALA
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
YMM - YALA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
HOOD - YALA
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
More