Advertisement
CLSK vs TTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and TTWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +22.33% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.31% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-1.96% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CLSK | TTWO | CLSK / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 6.18B | 47.5B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 626M | -2.87B | -22% |
| Gain YTD | 138.545 | 40.004 | 346% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.55 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 632M | 5.8B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 2.04B | 45% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 3.51B | 23% |
CLSK | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (99) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (76) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (99) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as CLSK (35) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (12) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CMCRX | 44.53 | 0.37 | +0.84% |
| Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx R6 | |||
| IYMIX | 30.85 | 0.23 | +0.75% |
| Macquarie Mid Cap Growth I | |||
| RIDAX | 27.26 | 0.09 | +0.33% |
| American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1 | |||
| LGSCX | 14.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity FI | |||
| NINCX | 22.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value C | |||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | +9.63% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | +9.88% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| AFRM - CLSK | 71% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 71% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | +9.63% | ||
More | ||||