CLSK
Price
$10.91
Change
-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAYS
Price
$5.26
Change
-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
289.53M
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs PAYS

Header iconCLSK vs PAYS Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs PAYSBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$10.91
Change-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Volume$16.51M
Capitalization2.79B
Paysign
Price$5.26
Change-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Volume$220.89K
Capitalization289.53M
CLSK vs PAYS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. PAYS commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and PAYS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $10.91 vs. PAYS: $5.26)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and PAYS are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while PAYS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 52% vs. PAYS: 59%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.79B vs. PAYS: $289.53M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.79B. PAYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $289.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.62T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYS is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAYS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than PAYS.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.31% price change this week, while PAYS (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

PAYS is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-0.32% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.79B) has a higher market cap than PAYS($290M). PAYS has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: PAYS (40.46) vs CLSK (9.74). PAYS YTD gains are higher at: 74.172 vs. CLSK (18.458). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 763M vs. PAYS (13.8M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. PAYS (7.53M). PAYS has less debt than CLSK: PAYS (6.08M) vs CLSK (824M). CLSK has higher revenues than PAYS: CLSK (766M) vs PAYS (74.9M).
CLSKPAYSCLSK / PAYS
Capitalization2.79B290M961%
EBITDA763M13.8M5,529%
Gain YTD18.45874.17225%
P/E Ratio9.7440.4624%
Revenue766M74.9M1,023%
Total Cash1.01B7.53M13,415%
Total Debt824M6.08M13,555%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs PAYS: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
PAYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9992
SMR RATING
1..100
4945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSK's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYS (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to PAYS’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's SMR Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (49) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (60) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (72) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKPAYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEMCX24.870.15
+0.61%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
MGRQX42.130.05
+0.12%
MFS International Growth R2
SBHAX16.58N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
IMOPX3.35N/A
N/A
Voya MidCap Opportunities Port S2
MSGAX11.73-0.04
-0.34%
Meridian Small Cap Growth A

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-4.30%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BITF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-7.12%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More

PAYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYS has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYS jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYS
1D Price
Change %
PAYS100%
-1.87%
CLSK - PAYS
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
DAVE - PAYS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
PDFS - PAYS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
QTWO - PAYS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
TOST - PAYS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More