Advertisement
CLSK vs PATH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and PATH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePATH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +22.33% price change this week, while PATH (@Computer Communications) price change was +11.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.
PATH is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.31% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Computer Communications (-0.16% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLSK | PATH | CLSK / PATH | |
| Capitalization | 6.18B | 8.75B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 626M | -31.12M | -2,012% |
| Gain YTD | 138.545 | 29.662 | 467% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.55 | 549.33 | 5% |
| Revenue | 632M | 1.5B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 1.45B | 63% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 79.3M | 1,034% |
CLSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLSK | PATH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CNYEUR | 0.12 | N/A | N/A |
| China Yuan - Euro | |||
| GCV | 4.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (The) | |||
| AUDUSD | 0.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Australian Dollar - United States Dollar | |||
| PJUL | 45.43 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul | |||
| TSLR | 31.11 | -1.00 | -3.11% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | +9.63% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | +9.88% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| AFRM - CLSK | 71% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 71% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||
PATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATH | 100% | -3.85% | ||
| COIN - PATH | 67% Closely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| CRM - PATH | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| PD - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| RIOT - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| CLSK - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | +9.63% | ||
More | ||||