Advertisement
CLSK vs NTES
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and NTES is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTES’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTES’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTES’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.39% price change this week, while NTES (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
NTES is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-1.46% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CLSK | NTES | CLSK / NTES | |
| Capitalization | 2.9B | 80.5B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 763M | 37.6B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 12.253 | -6.729 | -182% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.14 | 15.81 | 64% |
| Revenue | 766M | 112B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 824M | N/A | - |
CLSK | NTES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTES's Valuation (31) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (74) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's SMR Rating (37) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (49) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (63) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (67) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | NTES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VSS | 153.68 | 1.11 | +0.73% |
| Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US SmCp ETF | |||
| AVSF | 47.17 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | |||
| PBAP | 29.13 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Apr | |||
| BANX | 21.31 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| ArrowMark Financial Corp | |||
| DHDG | 34.56 | -0.14 | -0.40% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | +2.90% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| BITF - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 73% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| AFRM - CLSK | 71% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
NTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| BILI - NTES | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| YMM - NTES | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| NETTF - NTES | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RIOT - NTES | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CLSK - NTES | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||