CLSK
Price
$10.91
Change
-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INFA
Price
$24.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.64B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs INFA

Header iconCLSK vs INFA Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs INFABanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$10.91
Change-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Volume$16.51M
Capitalization2.79B
Informatica
Price$24.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.9M
Capitalization7.64B
CLSK vs INFA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. INFA commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and INFA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $10.91 vs. INFA: $24.79)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and INFA are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while INFA is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 52% vs. INFA: 113%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.79B vs. INFA: $7.64B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.79B. INFA’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $7.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.62T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINFA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • INFA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and INFA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INFA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INFA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INFA is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.31% price change this week, while INFA (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

INFA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-0.32% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFA($7.64B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($2.79B). INFA has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: INFA (842.88) vs CLSK (9.74). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 18.458 vs. INFA (-4.396). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 763M vs. INFA (303M). INFA has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. CLSK (1.01B). CLSK has less debt than INFA: CLSK (824M) vs INFA (1.86B). INFA has higher revenues than CLSK: INFA (1.66B) vs CLSK (766M).
CLSKINFACLSK / INFA
Capitalization2.79B7.64B36%
EBITDA763M303M252%
Gain YTD18.458-4.396-420%
P/E Ratio9.74842.881%
Revenue766M1.66B46%
Total Cash1.01B1.3B78%
Total Debt824M1.86B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKINFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X87301.43000066.687500
+0.08%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY690.31-0.07
-0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL273.40-0.41
-0.15%
Apple
GME21.09-0.44
-2.04%
GameStop Corp
TSLA475.19-10.21
-2.10%
Tesla

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-4.30%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BITF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-7.12%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More

INFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFA has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFA
1D Price
Change %
INFA100%
N/A
CLSK - INFA
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
COIN - INFA
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
PDFS - INFA
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
RIOT - INFA
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
GDDY - INFA
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More