CLSK
Price
$11.98
Change
-$1.35 (-10.13%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FROG
Price
$59.58
Change
-$2.09 (-3.39%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.05B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs FROG

Header iconCLSK vs FROG Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs FROGBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$11.98
Change-$1.35 (-10.13%)
Volume$35.12M
Capitalization3.57B
JFrog
Price$59.58
Change-$2.09 (-3.39%)
Volume$1.77M
Capitalization7.05B
CLSK vs FROG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. FROG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and FROG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $11.98 vs. FROG: $59.58)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and FROG are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while FROG is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 100% vs. FROG: 148%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.57B vs. FROG: $7.05B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.57B. FROG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFROG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FROG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than FROG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FROG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FROG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -22.21% price change this week, while FROG (@Packaged Software) price change was +26.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.95%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

FROG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.68% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROG($7.05B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($3.57B). FROG YTD gains are higher at: 109.691 vs. CLSK (44.734). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. FROG (-76.94M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. FROG (612M). FROG has less debt than CLSK: FROG (13.8M) vs CLSK (820M). CLSK has higher revenues than FROG: CLSK (632M) vs FROG (475M).
CLSKFROGCLSK / FROG
Capitalization3.57B7.05B51%
EBITDA626M-76.94M-814%
Gain YTD44.734109.69141%
P/E Ratio13.94N/A-
Revenue632M475M133%
Total Cash916M612M150%
Total Debt820M13.8M5,942%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKFROG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FROG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYEX22.540.16
+0.71%
Oakmark International Small Cap Advisor
HFCGX32.430.17
+0.53%
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
HILGX12.120.05
+0.41%
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Instl
FCNKX25.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Contrafund K
ALCFX97.94-0.91
-0.92%
Alger Focus Equity C

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-5.09%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
BITF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-5.93%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
HIVE - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-11.26%
More

FROG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FROG has been closely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FROG jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FROG
1D Price
Change %
FROG100%
-3.66%
RAMP - FROG
67%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
COIN - FROG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
CLSK - FROG
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.09%
GTLB - FROG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
RIOT - FROG
52%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
More