CLSH
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
75 days until earnings call
EAPIF
Price
$3.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLSH vs EAPIF

Header iconCLSH vs EAPIF Comparison
Open Charts CLSH vs EAPIFBanner chart's image
CLS Holdings USA
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$86.5K
CapitalizationN/A
EUROAPI SA
Price$3.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
CLSH vs EAPIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSH vs. EAPIF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSH is a Hold and EAPIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSH: $0.06 vs. EAPIF: $3.95)
Brand notoriety: CLSH and EAPIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSH: 283% vs. EAPIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLSH: $8.97M vs. EAPIF: $1.11B
CLSH [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $8.97M. EAPIF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEAPIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EAPIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSH is a better buy in the long-term than EAPIF.

Price Growth

CLSH (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +19.88% price change this week, while EAPIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSH is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.00% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAPIF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than CLSH($8.98M). CLSH YTD gains are higher at: 41.176 vs. EAPIF (-22.549). EAPIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.7M vs. CLSH (678K). EAPIF has higher revenues than CLSH: EAPIF (893M) vs CLSH (6.16M).
CLSHEAPIFCLSH / EAPIF
Capitalization8.98M1.11B1%
EBITDA678K62.7M1%
Gain YTD41.176-22.549-183%
P/E RatioN/A476.19-
Revenue6.16M893M1%
Total Cash0N/A-
Total Debt25.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSH: Fundamental Ratings
CLSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CLSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSH and TSNDF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSH and TSNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSH
1D Price
Change %
CLSH100%
+5.26%
TSNDF - CLSH
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
AGBIF - CLSH
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHPH - CLSH
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
DHBUF - CLSH
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
EAPIF - CLSH
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAPIF and ALVO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAPIF and ALVO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAPIF
1D Price
Change %
EAPIF100%
N/A
ALVO - EAPIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AKAN - EAPIF
19%
Poorly correlated
+10.28%
CLSH - EAPIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
PLSH - EAPIF
6%
Poorly correlated
-29.93%
STEK - EAPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More