Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs VAMO
CLSE vs VAMO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. VAMO commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and VAMO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 208M vs. VAMO (65.1M). VAMO has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: VAMO (10.751) vs CLSE (9.341). CLSE was incepted earlier than VAMO: CLSE (16 years) vs VAMO (10 years). VAMO (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). CLSE has a higher turnover VAMO (86.00) vs VAMO (86.00).
| CLSE | VAMO | CLSE / VAMO | |
| Gain YTD | 9.341 | 10.751 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 208M | 65.1M | 320% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.65 | 222% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 86.00 | 262% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | VAMO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 75% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| GEV - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
VAMO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VAMO has been loosely correlated with ARCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VAMO jumps, then ARCH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VAMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAMO | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARCH - VAMO | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MD - VAMO | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FOXA - VAMO | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| FOX - VAMO | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| PTGX - VAMO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||