Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs PHDG
CLSE vs PHDG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. PHDG commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and PHDG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 198M vs. PHDG (84.5M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than PHDG: CLSE (6.918) vs PHDG (-0.511). CLSE was incepted earlier than PHDG: CLSE (16 years) vs PHDG (13 years). PHDG (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). PHDG has a higher turnover CLSE (225.05) vs CLSE (225.05).
| CLSE | PHDG | CLSE / PHDG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.918 | -0.511 | -1,353% |
| Net Assets | 198M | 84.5M | 234% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.39 | 369% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 683.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 2.21 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | PHDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 64% | 16 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 75% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 75% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| GEV - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
More | ||||
PHDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHDG has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHDG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHDG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| MSFT - PHDG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| AMZN - PHDG | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AAPL - PHDG | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| META - PHDG | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| NVDA - PHDG | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||