Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$25.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Volume$31.41K
Net Assets208.16M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.65
Change+$0.16 (+0.58%)
Volume$375
Net Assets20.03M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and LSEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 208M vs. LSEQ (20M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: CLSE (9.341) vs LSEQ (0.953). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). CLSE has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 9.341 | 0.953 | 981% |
| Net Assets | 208M | 20M | 1,040% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 194.00 | 116% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 75% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| GEV - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and ECL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CNP - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| KMI - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| WMB - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||