Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.62
Change-$0.52 (-1.92%)
Volume$80.26K
Net Assets244.83M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$28.50
Change-$0.51 (-1.76%)
Volume$676
Net Assets20.29M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and LSEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 245M vs. LSEQ (20.3M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: CLSE (16.194) vs LSEQ (5.909). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). CLSE has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 16.194 | 5.909 | 274% |
| Net Assets | 245M | 20.3M | 1,207% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 194.00 | 116% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 22 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 63% | 24 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -5.61% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -7.77% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -14.21% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and APP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and APP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| APP - LSEQ | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| BSX - LSEQ | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| DGX - LSEQ | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
| ADSK - LSEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| COST - LSEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||