Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$25.82
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
Volume$39.36K
Net Assets216.7M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.94
Change-$0.32 (-1.13%)
Volume$2.73K
Net Assets20.26M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and LSEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 217M vs. LSEQ (20.3M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: CLSE (12.702) vs LSEQ (2.019). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). CLSE has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 12.702 | 2.019 | 629% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 20.3M | 1,069% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 194.00 | 116% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| GEV - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and ECL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| CNP - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| KMI - LSEQ | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| ETR - LSEQ | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||