Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$27.75
Change-$0.77 (-2.70%)
Volume$132
Net Assets312.33M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$30.98
Change-$0.68 (-2.15%)
Volume$4.56K
Net Assets15.03M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and LSEQ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 312M vs. LSEQ (15M). LSEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: LSEQ (14.790) vs CLSE (4.354). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). LSEQ has a higher turnover CLSE (225.05) vs CLSE (225.05).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 4.354 | 14.790 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 312M | 15M | 2,080% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 308.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 2.01 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 62% | 28 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and USFD have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and USFD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +3.27% | ||
| USFD - LSEQ | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.18% | ||
| DGX - LSEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| COST - LSEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| AA - LSEQ | 14% Poorly correlated | +5.39% | ||
| UHS - LSEQ | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||