Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$27.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets253.66M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$28.31
Change-$0.23 (-0.81%)
Volume$14.5K
Net Assets19.81M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and LSEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 254M vs. LSEQ (19.8M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: CLSE (18.420) vs LSEQ (4.577). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). CLSE has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 18.420 | 4.577 | 402% |
| Net Assets | 254M | 19.8M | 1,283% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 194.00 | 116% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and ADSK have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and ADSK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADSK - LSEQ | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BSX - LSEQ | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| DGX - LSEQ | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| APP - LSEQ | 16% Poorly correlated | +4.71% | ||
| AR - LSEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||