Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FTLS
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FTLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$285
Net Assets244.83M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$71.06
Change-$0.14 (-0.20%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.13B
CLSE vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FTLS commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FTLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.13B vs. CLSE (245M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FTLS: CLSE (16.194) vs FTLS (9.085). CLSE was incepted earlier than FTLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FTLS (1.38) and CLSE (1.44) have comparable expense ratios . FTLS (235.00) and CLSE (225.05) have matching turnover.
| CLSE | FTLS | CLSE / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | 16.194 | 9.085 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 245M | 2.13B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.38 | 104% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 235.00 | 96% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 63% | 8 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -5.61% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -7.77% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -14.21% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| SEIC - FTLS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| AXP - FTLS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | -3.99% | ||
| SF - FTLS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||