Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$28.52
Change+$2.70 (+10.46%)
Volume$110.28K
Net Assets312.33M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.11
Change-$1.82 (-7.30%)
Volume$7.81K
Net Assets39.59M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 312M vs. FFLS (39.6M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLSE (4.354) vs FFLS (-0.451). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FFLS (3 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). FFLS has a higher turnover CLSE (225.05) vs CLSE (225.05).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.354 | -0.451 | -966% |
| Net Assets | 312M | 39.6M | 788% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 313.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.12 | 754% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||