Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$25.92
Change+$0.10 (+0.39%)
Volume$100
Net Assets216.7M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$5.93K
Net Assets40.96M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 217M vs. FFLS (41M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLSE (12.702) vs FFLS (11.121). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.702 | 11.121 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 41M | 529% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 88.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.16 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 73% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| GEV - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| PANW - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||