Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.62
Change-$0.52 (-1.92%)
Volume$80.26K
Net Assets244.83M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$13.08K
Net Assets40.01M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 245M vs. FFLS (40M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLSE (18.464) vs FFLS (7.469). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). FFLS has a higher turnover CLSE (225.05) vs CLSE (225.05).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 18.464 | 7.469 | 247% |
| Net Assets | 245M | 40M | 613% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 313.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.16 | 501% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||