Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs DFND
CLSE vs DFND Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs DFND
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$27.73
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Volume$40.48K
Net Assets268.48M
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$43.85
Change+$0.30 (+0.69%)
Volume$790
Net Assets8.98M
CLSE vs DFND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. DFND commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and DFND is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 268M vs. DFND (8.98M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than DFND: CLSE (21.039) vs DFND (11.850). CLSE was incepted earlier than DFND: CLSE (16 years) vs DFND (10 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). CLSE has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| CLSE | DFND | CLSE / DFND | |
| Gain YTD | 21.039 | 11.850 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 268M | 8.98M | 2,983% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.75 | 82% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 115.00 | 196% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 0.95 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | DFND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and PWR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | N/A | ||
| PWR - DFND | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NVDA - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||