Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs DFND
CLSE vs DFND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. DFND commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and DFND is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 285M vs. DFND (8.98M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than DFND: CLSE (1.756) vs DFND (-0.136). CLSE was incepted earlier than DFND: CLSE (16 years) vs DFND (10 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). CLSE has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| CLSE | DFND | CLSE / DFND | |
| Gain YTD | 1.756 | -0.136 | -1,290% |
| Net Assets | 285M | 8.98M | 3,173% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.75 | 82% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 115.00 | 196% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | DFND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +4.56% | ||
More | ||||
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and RMD have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and RMD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | N/A | ||
| RMD - DFND | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| PWR - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
| NVDA - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||