Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs DFND
CLSE vs DFND Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs DFND
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.61
Change-$0.53 (-1.95%)
Volume$212
Net Assets243.43M
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$43.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$279
Net Assets9.04M
CLSE vs DFND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. DFND commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and DFND is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 243M vs. DFND (9.04M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than DFND: CLSE (18.464) vs DFND (12.003). CLSE was incepted earlier than DFND: CLSE (16 years) vs DFND (10 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). CLSE has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| CLSE | DFND | CLSE / DFND | |
| Gain YTD | 18.464 | 12.003 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 243M | 9.04M | 2,689% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.75 | 82% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 115.00 | 196% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.95 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | DFND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and RMD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and RMD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| PWR - DFND | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| NVDA - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||