Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs CPZ
CLSE vs CPZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. CPZ commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and CPZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 329M vs. CLSE (286M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: CPZ (3.215) vs CLSE (0.842). CLSE was incepted earlier than CPZ: CLSE (16 years) vs CPZ (6 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). CPZ has a higher turnover CLSE (225.05) vs CLSE (225.05).
| CLSE | CPZ | CLSE / CPZ | |
| Gain YTD | 0.842 | 3.215 | 26% |
| Net Assets | 286M | 329M | 87% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.85 | 78% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 249.00 | 90% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | CPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.29% | ||
More | ||||