CLS
Price
$312.40
Change
+$2.36 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:18 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.64B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTDKF
Price
$12.71
Change
-$0.27 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
24.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs TTDKF

Header iconCLS vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$312.40
Change+$2.36 (+0.76%)
Volume$2.84K
Capitalization35.64B
TDK
Price$12.71
Change-$0.27 (-2.08%)
Volume$3.79K
Capitalization24.36B
CLS vs TTDKF Comparison Chart in %
CLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTDKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. TTDKF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and TTDKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CLS: $310.04 vs. TTDKF: $12.71)
Brand notoriety: CLS and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 98% vs. TTDKF: 55%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $35.64B vs. TTDKF: $24.36B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $35.64B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $24.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $179.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the short-term than TTDKF.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +1.36% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was -9.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+3.62% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($35.6B) has a higher market cap than TTDKF($24.4B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than TTDKF: CLS (50.41) vs TTDKF (22.24). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 4.881 vs. TTDKF (-16.139). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 466B vs. CLS (1.09B). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 874B vs. CLS (306M). CLS has less debt than TTDKF: CLS (784M) vs TTDKF (670B). TTDKF has higher revenues than CLS: TTDKF (2.3T) vs CLS (11.3B).
CLSTTDKFCLS / TTDKF
Capitalization35.6B24.4B146%
EBITDA1.09B466B0%
Gain YTD4.881-16.139-30%
P/E Ratio50.4122.24227%
Revenue11.3B2.3T0%
Total Cash306M874B0%
Total Debt784M670B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6467
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
784
SMR RATING
1..100
246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1672
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (78) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTDKF (84) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CLS (24) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (61) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (72) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTDKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHM31.830.06
+0.19%
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
MHF6.980.01
+0.14%
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund
CHPS52.35-0.16
-0.31%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
SPHB122.40-0.69
-0.56%
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
CRMG11.06-0.15
-1.34%
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
-5.64%
FLEX - CLS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
FN - CLS
74%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
GLW - CLS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
JBL - CLS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
APH - CLS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTDKF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTDKF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-2.10%
MRAAY - TTDKF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
CLS - TTDKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.64%
SOTGY - TTDKF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
TYOYY - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
More