CLS
Price
$66.14
Change
-$3.05 (-4.41%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.89B
17 days until earnings call
FN
Price
$171.03
Change
-$1.53 (-0.89%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.21B
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLS vs FN

Header iconCLS vs FN Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs FNBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$66.14
Change-$3.05 (-4.41%)
Volume$25.67K
Capitalization7.89B
Fabrinet
Price$171.03
Change-$1.53 (-0.89%)
Volume$12.32K
Capitalization6.21B
CLS vs FN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. FN commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and FN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $69.19 vs. FN: $172.56)
Brand notoriety: CLS and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 140% vs. FN: 162%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $7.89B vs. FN: $6.21B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $7.89B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $83.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than FN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -18.01% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was -16.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -7.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

FN is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-7.41% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($7.89B) has a higher market cap than FN($6.21B). FN (19.30) and CLS (19.17) have similar P/E ratio . FN YTD gains are higher at: -21.521 vs. CLS (-25.038). CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 736M vs. FN (395M). FN has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. CLS (423M). FN has less debt than CLS: FN (6.09M) vs CLS (797M). CLS has higher revenues than FN: CLS (9.65B) vs FN (3.12B).
CLSFNCLS / FN
Capitalization7.89B6.21B127%
EBITDA736M395M186%
Gain YTD-25.038-21.521116%
P/E Ratio19.1719.3099%
Revenue9.65B3.12B309%
Total Cash423M935M45%
Total Debt797M6.09M13,081%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7778
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3121
SMR RATING
1..100
4148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4969
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (70) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (71). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (31). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (41) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (48). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (59). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (69). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been loosely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
-15.98%
FLEX - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
-13.93%
APH - CLS
63%
Loosely correlated
-7.72%
FN - CLS
60%
Loosely correlated
-14.52%
SANM - CLS
54%
Loosely correlated
-10.77%
GLW - CLS
48%
Loosely correlated
-9.13%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-14.52%
CLS - FN
60%
Loosely correlated
-15.98%
APH - FN
58%
Loosely correlated
-7.72%
FLEX - FN
54%
Loosely correlated
-13.93%
GLW - FN
47%
Loosely correlated
-9.13%
KN - FN
43%
Loosely correlated
-11.73%
More