CLS
Price
$170.22
Change
+$6.24 (+3.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
19.72B
2 days until earnings call
FN
Price
$308.89
Change
+$4.04 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.07B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs FN

Header iconCLS vs FN Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs FNBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$170.22
Change+$6.24 (+3.81%)
Volume$2.59M
Capitalization19.72B
Fabrinet
Price$308.89
Change+$4.04 (+1.33%)
Volume$236.58K
Capitalization11.07B
CLS vs FN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. FN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and FN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $170.22 vs. FN: $308.89)
Brand notoriety: CLS and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 79% vs. FN: 47%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $19.72B vs. FN: $11.07B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $19.72B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $11.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $127.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLS and FN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.31% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.74% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($19.7B) has a higher market cap than FN($11.1B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than FN: CLS (47.55) vs FN (34.44). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 84.420 vs. FN (40.481). CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 746M vs. FN (399M). FN has more cash in the bank: 951M vs. CLS (303M). FN has less debt than CLS: FN (5.72M) vs CLS (942M). CLS has higher revenues than FN: CLS (10.1B) vs FN (3.26B).
CLSFNCLS / FN
Capitalization19.7B11.1B177%
EBITDA746M399M187%
Gain YTD84.42040.481209%
P/E Ratio47.5534.44138%
Revenue10.1B3.26B310%
Total Cash303M951M32%
Total Debt942M5.72M16,466%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1814
SMR RATING
1..100
3849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (71) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (80). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (18). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (49). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (40). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (31). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WANT45.331.27
+2.88%
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3X ETF
VFL9.470.07
+0.74%
abrdn National Municipal Income Fund
XRT81.770.24
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P Retail ETF
FIXD43.540.10
+0.23%
First Trust Smith Opportnstc Fxd Inc ETF
JULM32.740.03
+0.10%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Jul

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+3.81%
FLEX - CLS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
APH - CLS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
JBL - CLS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
FN - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
SANM - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+1.33%
APH - FN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
CLS - FN
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
GLW - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
FLEX - FN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
JBL - FN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More