It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLEX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while FLEX (@Electronic Components) price change was -2.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.42%.
CLS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
FLEX is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
CLS | FLEX | CLS / FLEX | |
Capitalization | 9.42B | 14.6B | 65% |
EBITDA | 710M | 1.47B | 48% |
Gain YTD | 180.225 | 70.875 | 254% |
P/E Ratio | 25.47 | 18.10 | 141% |
Revenue | 9.24B | 25.4B | 36% |
Total Cash | 398M | 2.6B | 15% |
Total Debt | 941M | 4.19B | 22% |
CLS | FLEX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLEX's Valuation (58) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (70). This means that FLEX’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.
FLEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (5). This means that FLEX’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (53). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (39). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (48). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.
CLS | FLEX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 7 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLS | 100% | -2.39% | ||
FN - CLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
FLEX - CLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
APH - CLS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
PLXS - CLS | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
SANM - CLS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLEX has been loosely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLEX jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLEX | 100% | -0.26% | ||
CLS - FLEX | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
PLXS - FLEX | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
SANM - FLEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
FN - FLEX | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
KN - FLEX | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More |